New trends, endless options, and prices that verge on the impossibly low. For those with the means, fashion trends drop fast and fade faster. Buy it, wear it, toss it—fickle as ever, onto the next obsession. Influencing identity formation and the environment at large, faux-couture’s place in fashion is being tested by local resistance, public policy, and industry game changers.
***
Fast fashion is built on mass production, a process now increasingly driven by AI systems to sustain the rapid churn of trends. From fabricating denim micro skirts to bohemian-style sundresses, the machine adapts to an ever-evolving cultural landscape.
How did fast fashion become so ubiquitous? According to Nikolay Anguelov, an assistant professor of Public Policy at the University of Massachusetts, the industry’s core demographic has shifted toward young consumers who drive demand. “Allowance money plays a powerful role in this cruel game of disposable fashion. The obsession is with novelty and affordability,” he explained.
Joy Buchanan, an associate professor of Quantitative Analysis and Economics at Samford University, expanded on this idea: “Fast fashion is partly just a sign of a richer world. We can all have more of everything, including customized clothes.” In a world where clothing is cheaper than ever, the desire to reinvent oneself through fashion isn’t just encouraged—it’s expected. “Now that T-shirts are so cheap to make, it’s not surprising that people print them up for a single club event with little thought about the financial or environmental cost. Financially speaking, shirts are almost as disposable as plastic forks,” said Buchanan.
Enabled by affluence, teenagers shop online constantly—not just for clothing, but for an ever-changing identity. “Now a 16-year-old is a digital native—a digital human who buys online, buys often, and buys to create their digital identity,” Anguelov added. For many, clothing is more than just fabric—it’s a fleeting statement, discarded as soon as the algorithm demands something new.
The psychology of fast fashion consumption, particularly among young consumers, ties deeply to the social validation of trends. TikTok hauls and influencer endorsements create an illusion of accessibility—if everyone else wears the latest look, missing out entails personal failure. “There’s a certain pressure to be seen in new outfits constantly, and fast fashion makes that financially possible,” said Anguelov.
This rapid cycle of trend adoption and abandonment doesn’t happen by chance—it’s algorithmically engineered. AI-powered platforms study consumer behavior, tracking which styles gain traction and supplying this data to production lines. The result: an endless cycle of disposable fashion that feeds itself and is observed in the business models of the biggest fashion companies worldwide.
Shein, a global e-commerce platform emblematic of the fast fashion crisis, reportedly lists 6,000 new items daily. At a retail conference in January 2024, Peter Pernot-Day, head of global strategy and corporate affairs in North America and Europe, said that the company’s adaptive model is a byproduct of machine-learning technologies predicting demand.
“Instead of having a design team at H&M or Zara stealing ideas, product managers now have big digital libraries,” said Anguelov. Often operating with minimal oversight, these factories can produce thousands of styles overnight, ensuring that the latest micro-trends hit digital storefronts before they fade from relevance.
Buchanan further explained: “Brands don’t have to guess what people will buy anymore. They use AI to scrape data from Instagram and TikTok to see what’s trending, and within days, they can produce exactly what consumers want.”
***
While offering unprecedented affordability and speed, fast fashion conglomerates have an overlooked price tag: the environment. The average U.S. consumer discards 81.5 pounds of clothing each year—equivalent to over 2,150 pieces discarded every second in the U.S. alone. “People buy new clothing even though we have enough right now to clothe the next six generations,” commented Esperance Han ‘28, an environmental studies major and member of Yale Sustainability.
The environmental toll doesn’t stop at waste. The production processes behind fast fashion are resource-intensive, requiring vast amounts of water and energy, and often result in the release of toxic chemicals into ecosystems. A significant portion of clothing production relies on polyester, a synthetic fiber that contributes to microplastic pollution and takes hundreds of years to break down. Consuming over 70 barrels of oil in 2015, polyester production adds to habitat fragmentation and fossil fuel overconsumption.
These microplastics have been detected in water sources worldwide, entering the food chain and potentially affecting human health. “It makes sense. Fast fashion industries produce items in the cheapest way possible, which inherently means more dangerous chemicals, and that thin, cheap fabric is used in production,” said Han.
While we know that synthetic clothing, particularly polyester, contributes to microplastic pollution, the long-term consequences remain unclear. “Are these particles relatively benign, processed by our bodies similarly to natural particles like sand and dirt, or do they pose more serious health risks that we’ve yet to uncover?” Buchanan questioned.
***
Fast fashion has turned clothing into a battleground of fleeting trends, discarded waste, and environmental and health concerns. Yet, amid the chaos of fast fashion, a quiet resistance is building—strategic players are actively working to disrupt the system.
Witch Bitch Thrift, an alternative, LGBTQ-owned, women-run store in New Haven, is not just a place to shop, it’s a community-driven hub. “We wanted to create a space where secondhand clothing is accessible to everyone, especially when it comes to size inclusion,” said Virginia Semeghini, one of the founders.
The store’s mission has expanded far beyond offering affordable and diverse clothing. “It has evolved. I’ve become painfully aware of the environmental impact of fast fashion, and now sustainability is at the forefront of everything we do,” added Semeghini.
The shop’s approach to combating the fashion industry’s environmental toll includes a live buying process, where people can trade in their old clothes for cash or store credit. “We want to get clothes out of people’s trunks and back into circulation,” Virginia explained. This initiative fosters a barter system where customers can exchange unwanted items for new pieces, reducing waste and promoting a sustainable consumption cycle.
Even with fast fashion’s presence in the shop, Semeghini stressed the importance of giving these items a second life. “The damage is done. We’re better off keeping these things worn and out there than letting them end up in landfills.”
Through the “Community Fund,” Witch Bitch offers free store credit to those who may not have the means to shop secondhand otherwise. “If someone needs clothes—whether for gender affirmation, work, or just because—they can come in and get what they need,” shared Semeghini.
At Witch Bitch Thrift, sustainability, inclusivity, and community aren’t just buzzwords—they’re the foundation of their approach, proving that shopping secondhand can be both empowering and essential in the fight against fast fashion.
***
Efforts to curb fast fashion’s impact have evolved to fill gaps in the industry. Rachel Kibbe, founder and CEO of Circular Services Group (CSG), zeroes in on sustainable consulting efforts and circularity. “I used to run a large-scale used clothing collection and resale business and saw firsthand how broken the system was. The U.S. lacks the infrastructure to process textile waste domestically, which means most of it gets exported—or worse, landfilled,” she said. CSG’s work focuses on bridging this gap: helping brands and the private sector comply with evolving sustainability regulations, implement circular business models, and develop practical solutions to textile waste.
Circularity, at its core, is about keeping materials in use for as long as possible—through reuse, repair, and recycling—rather than discarding them after a short lifecycle. But, without the right infrastructure, circularity remains an ideal rather than a reality.
“I found myself sitting on over a million pounds of clothes with nowhere to send them. That moment solidified for me that without policy support and financial investment, circularity would never be viable. I launched Circular Services Group to help businesses navigate that landscape,” said Kibbe.
CSG’s work reaches every corner of the fashion industry microcosm, impacting policy, business practices, and sustainability efforts. In September of 2024, CSG consulted on SB 707 in California, the first textile Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) bill in U.S. history, which requires brands to take responsibility for the circularity of their products. However, Kibbe’s work also extends to the other side of the equation.
“I work with law firms and investors on sustainable partnerships while helping brands navigate compliance with EPR laws. A key part of my work is creating the infrastructure to support both sides,” she said.
***
While industry leaders like CSG push for circular solutions, policymakers are beginning to recognize the need to work alongside them by providing legislative support. In June 2024, the U.S. Congress took a step toward promoting sustainable fashion by establishing the Congressional Slow Fashion Caucus. This bipartisan group, led by Representatives Chellie Pingree (D-Maine), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.), and Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-Calif.), aims to tackle the environmental and social challenges posed by the fast fashion industry.
Kibbe consulted the Slow Fashion Caucus through CSG’s policy coalition, American Circular Textiles (ACT), as she believes that “advocacy and messaging matter at the national level. With policymakers, we advocate for both regulations and financial mechanisms. Without financial support to accompany these regulations, businesses will struggle to adhere to large asks.” Emphasizing the intersection of policy, researchers, and brands, Kibbe commented that “we build coalitions and highlight brand responsibility, but it all boils down to everyone playing their part for sufficient compliance.”
***
Partnering with brands such as L.L. Bean, thredUP, and Patagonia, the caucus works alongside the industry to influence fashion policy. Patagonia, an industry leader in the shift to recycled materials, uses 97% recycled polyester and 91% recycled nylon by weight. “Many of our practices align with slow fashion conceptually: durability, classic designs, utility, quality over everything,” said Gin Ando, an Executive of Communications at Patagonia.
Patagonia integrates these ideals into its business model, broadening the market’s understanding of quality: “Although most people associate quality with durability, we use a system that accounts for things like utility—can it be used for more than one activity or sport? Fast fashion relies on the speed of production matching the velocity of trends—we operate on something close to the polar opposite of [the fast fashion] mentality,” said Ando.
In a similar vein, effective messaging is crucial in shaping consumer perceptions and driving meaningful change, especially regarding sustainability. In 2024, Patagonia released The Shitthropocene, a short film exploring the psychological and biological signals that feed overconsumption down to the cellular level. Shown in stores, this 45-minute anthropological approach to consumerism reminds customers to be wary of impulse buys.
To expose the dangers of consumer culture and the thrill of aimless purchases, Patagonia sought to establish a bottom line of awareness. “Storytelling is by far the best way to convey this kind of information,” said Ando. “Film is one of the most powerful ways for us to tell those stories.”
Despite substantial progress, there’s much more ground to cover. For example, the power of online influencers remains yet to be utilized for the collective benefit. “Take the anti-glitter campaign for example. It was all the rage until the Eras Tour influenced a spike in glitter sales and it all went down the drain,” said Anguelov, who noted that individuals with large platforms can undermine sustainability efforts through mixed messaging. “It all starts digitally. How the messages are being communicated to you by whom, at what frequency, and with what promises. Influencers are powerful and we need to pool their efforts in the right direction,” he said.
***
At its core, leveraging community, platforms, and corporate responsibility is key to driving change. By aligning with policy, corporations can amplify their message and shift societal norms toward sustainability.
Fast fashion, in essence, is fleeting, fractured, and fundamentally a reaction to a capitalist society. Amid dynamic digital identities and a wealthier world, the environment is paying the price for rapid consumption.
However, every effort is contingent upon a shared vision of the future, with consultant groups and policymakers driving brand change from within. Only by reimagining fashion’s foundation can we restore its true meaning and acknowledge the complexity of an industry where countless actors, from designers to consumers, shape trends, production, and waste.